Using argumentation to manage users’ preferences
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Applying CBR to manage argumentation in MAS
The application of argumentation theories and techniques in multi-agent systems has become a prolific area of research. Argumentation allows agents to harmonize two types of disagreement situations: internal, when the acquisition of new information (e.g. about the environment or about other agents) produces incoherences in the agents’ mental state; and external, when agents that have different ...
متن کاملAn Ontology-Based Context Model to manage Users Preferences and Conflicts
In the last decade, ubiquitous computing (UC) has become an aspiration of the computing community. Nowadays, it is so profound that it is increasingly indistinguishable from the overall agenda of computing research. In UC, the main objective is to provide users the ability to access services and resources anytime, anywhere, in particular using Mobile Devices (MD). Applications in this domain ar...
متن کاملEmpowering Users to Specify and Manage Their Privacy Preferences in e-Government Environments
The provision of advanced e-Government services has raised users’ concerns on personal data disclosure and privacy violation threats as more and more information is released to various governmental service providers. Towards this direction, the employment of Privacy Policies and Preferences has been proposed in an attempt to simplify the provision of electronic services while preserving users’ ...
متن کاملDetermining Preferences Through Argumentation
Arguments concerning what an agent should do cannot be considered in isolation: they occur in the context of debates where arguments attacking and defending each other are advanced. This is recognised by the use of argumentation frameworks which determine the status of an argument by reference to its presence in a coherent position: a subset of the arguments advanced which is collectively able ...
متن کاملRevisiting Preferences and Argumentation
The ASPIC framework is intermediate in abstraction between Dung’s argumentation framework and concrete instantiating logics. This paper generalises ASPIC to accommodate classical logic instantiations, and adopts a new proposal for evaluating extensions: attacks are used to define the notion of conflict-free sets, while the defeats obtained by applying preferences to attacks, are exclusively use...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Future Generation Computer Systems
سال: 2018
ISSN: 0167-739X
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2017.09.040